Michael Paquier wrote: > Now, do we really want this feature in-core? That's somewhat a duplicate of > what is mentioned here: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqQMq=4ejak317mxz4has0i+1rslbqu29zx18jwlb2j...@mail.gmail.com > Of course both things do not have the same coverage as the former is for > buildfarm and dev, while the latter is dedidated to production systems, but > could be used for development as well.
Oh, I had forgotten that other patch. > The patch sent there is a bit outdated, but a potential implementation gets > simpler with XLogReadBufferForRedo able to return flags about each block > state during redo. I am still planning to come back to it for this cycle, > though I stopped for now waiting for the WAL format patches finish to shape > the APIs this feature would rely on. I agree it makes sense to wait until the WAL reworks are done -- glad to hear you're putting some time in this area. Thanks, -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
