On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > pg_prewarm() currently can't be cannot be interrupted - which seems odd > given that it's intended to read large amounts of data from disk. A > rather slow process. > > Unless somebody protests I'm going to add a check to the top of each of > the three loops. Good idea, +1. -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
