Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote:
> > I personally find the direct access actually more readable, so I'm not a > > fan of further extending the scheme. Consistency with some other common > > accessors is an argument though. > > What you meant is "relation->rd_rel->relpersistence" is more readable than > "RelationGetPersistence(relation)" ?? I too have a hard time getting excited about this change. I'd just leave it alone. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
