On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > The more important thing here is that I see little chance of this > getting in before Heikki's larger rework of the wal format gets > in. Since that'll change everything around anyay I'm unsure how much > point there is to iterate till that's done. I know that sucks, but I > don't see much of an alternative. True enough. Hopefully the next patch changing WAL format will put in all the infrastructure around backup blocks, so we won't have any need to worry about major conflicts for this release cycle after it. -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
