On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> My point is: I am not sure I can be defined as a reviewer of this >> patch or take any credit in this patch review knowing that the latest >> version submitted is a simple rebase of the version I did my first >> review on. Hence, code speaking, this patch is in the same state as >> when it has been firstly submitted. > > Of course you can. Time spent reviewing is time spent reviewing, > whether it results in changes to the patch or not.
My thoughts exactly. I thought Michael did a good job, even if I didn't agree with everything he said. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
