On 11/12/14 7:31 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > Yes, it sucks. But it beats not being able to reindex a relation with a > primary key (referenced by a fkey) without waiting several hours by a > couple magnitudes. And that's the current situation.
That's fine, but we have, for better or worse, defined CONCURRENTLY := does not take exclusive locks. Use a different adverb for an in-between facility. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
