On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > >> I find it confusing that the "Lowest" pointer value is also "Invalid". >> Valid != Invalid >> > In complement to that, note that I mentioned Invalid should be UINT_MAX > for clarity. > Worth noticing that this patch has been marked as returned with feedback. -- Michael
