On 11/18/2014 04:58 PM, Adam Brightwell wrote:
All,
Currently, I am using int32 simply because int64 is causing some
issues. The issue is that genbki.pl <http://genbki.pl> is not
able to associate it with the int8 type as defined in pg_type.h.
Therefore Schema_pg_authid in schemapg.h isn't defined correctly.
I've been digging and scratching my head on this one but I have
reached a point where I think it would be better just to ask.
Attached is a quite trivial patch that addresses the int64 (C) to int8
(SQL) mapping issue.
Further digging revealed that Catalog.pm wasn't accounting for int64
(thanks Stephen). Would it be better to include this change as a
separate patch (as attached) or would it be preferable to include with
a larger role attribute bitmask patch?
I think we should just apply this now. As Tom said the reason for not
doing it is long gone.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
