Stephen Frost wrote > * Alvaro Herrera ( > alvherre@
> ) wrote: >> Stephen Frost wrote: >> > * Amit Kapila ( > amit.kapila16@ > ) wrote: >> > > What exactly you mean by 'disable postgresql.auto.conf', do you >> > > mean user runs Alter System to remove that entry or manually disable >> > > some particular entry? >> >> Sigh, here we go again. I don't think you can disable >> postgresql.auto.conf >> in the current code. As I recall, the argument was that it's harder to >> diagnose problems if postgresql.auto.conf takes effect in some system >> but not others. > > I don't buy this at all. What's going to be terribly confusing is to > have config changes start happening for users who are managing their > configs through a CM (which most should be..). ALTER SYSTEM is going to > cause more problems than it solves. So what happens if someone makes postgresql.auto.conf read-only (to everyone)? David J. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/Turning-recovery-conf-into-GUCs-tp5774757p5828052.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers