Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> writes:
>>>
>>> I think we need to fix all of those, and backpatch. Per attached.
>>
>> Yikes!  Looks sane to me.
>
> Ok thanks, committed. It didn't apply cleanly to 9.0, 9.1 and 9.2, so
> the patch for those branches looks a bit different.

Great.  Are you looking at the actual replication URI patch?  Or should
I add it to commitfest so we don't lose track of it?

--
Alex


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to