On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to define new something object type and remove do_user and do_system. > But if we add OBJECT_SYSTEM to ObjectType data type, > system catalogs are OBJECT_SYSTEM as well as OBJECT_TABLE. > It's a bit redundant? Yes, kind of. That's a superset of a type of relations, aka a set of catalog tables. If you find something cleaner to propose, feel free.
>> Another thing, ReindexDatabaseOrSchema should be renamed to ReindexObject. >> So, I think that we need to think a bit more here. We are not far from >> smth that could be committed, so marking as "Waiting on Author" for >> now. Thoughts? > > Is the table also kind of "object"? Sorry, I am not sure I follow you here. Indexes and tables have already their relkind set in ReindexStmt, and I think that we're fine to continue letting them go in their own reindex code path for now. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
