On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Heikki Linnakangas > <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote: > > It also would be quite straightforward to write a separate tool to do > just > > that. Would be better than conflating pg_rewind with this. You could use > > pg_rewind as the basis for it - it's under the same license as > PostgreSQL. > > Agree. I would want to work on that. > If we had such a tool in core, would that completely solve the > differential backup problem, or would more be needed? In my opinion yes. > This discussion is not really adapted on hackers as pg_rewind is not > included in Postgres core code. Please let's discuss your proposal there. Got it. But given the above, can we keep this discussion thread here? Best Regards, *Sameer Kumar | Database Consultant* *ASHNIK PTE. LTD.* 101 Cecil Street, #11-11 Tong Eng Building, Singapore 069533 M: *+65 8110 0350* T: +65 6438 3504 | www.ashnik.com *[image: icons]* [image: Email patch] <http://www.ashnik.com/> This email may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material and is solely for the use of the intended recipient(s).
