On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > My radical proposal therefore would have been to embrace this > inconsistency and get rid of PGC_BACKEND and PGC_SU_BACKEND altogether, > relying on users interpreting the parameter names to indicate that > changing them later may or may not have an effect. Unfortunately, the > concerns about ignore_system_indexes prevent that.
What exactly are those concerns? Do you have a link to previous discussion? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
