Since I don't have clear idea how to promote this, I will remake and be back with new patch based on Andres' for patches.
> Hmm.. Sorry for my stupidity. > > > Why is that necessary? It seems really rather wrong to make > > BIO_set_retry_write() dependant on ProcDiePending? Especially as, at > > least in my testing, it's not even required because the be_tls_write() > > can just check the error properly? > > I mistook the previous conversation as it doesn't work as > expected. I confirmed that it works fine. > > After all, it works as I expected. The parameter for > ProcessClientWriteInterrupt() looks somewhat uneasy but the patch > 4 looks fine as a whole. Do you have anything to worry about in > the patch? regards, -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
