Re: Tom Lane 2014-12-15 <21813.1418655...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> This is totally silly.  The timecnt couldn't be anywhere near INT_MAX (in
> fact, it is not allowed to exceed TZ_MAX_TIMES, which is currently just
> 1200).  And there are bunches of other instances of similar code in PG;
> shall we put equally wishy-washy comments on them all?

Well, if it's not interesting, let's just forget it. Sorry.

Christoph
-- 
c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to