On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmonc...@gmail.com> wrote: > OTOH, Our built in compressor as we all know is a complete dog in > terms of cpu when stacked up against some more modern implementations. > All that said, as long as there is a clean path to migrating to > another compression alg should one materialize, that problem can be > nicely decoupled from this patch as Robert pointed out. I am curious to see some numbers about that. Has anyone done such comparison measurements? -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers