On 12/16/2014 4:32 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 15 December 2014 at 19:52, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote:
On 12/15/2014 11:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
I feel like we used to be better at encouraging people to participate
in the CF even if they were not experts, and to do the best they can
based on what they did know.  That was a helpful dynamic.  Sure, the
reviews weren't perfect, but more people helped, and reviewing some of
the patch well and some of it in a more cursory manner is way better
than reviewing none of it at all.

Well, it was strongly expressed to me by a number of senior contributors
on this list and at the developer meeting that inexpert reviews were not
really wanted, needed or helpful.  As such, I stopped recruiting new
reviewers (and, for that matter, doing them myself).  I don't know if
the same goes for anyone else.

I don't remember saying that, hearing it or agreeing with it and I
don't agree with it now.


As a reviewer from long long ago, I can tell you that I wasn't sure I was even helpful.

Things got busy at work, and I may not have been useful, and I annoyed some people on pg-general, so I walked away for a while.

I have no knowledge of community-building so this might be a bad idea:

Perhaps levels (or titles) of reviewer's would be helpful. A freshman reviewer is not expected to do anything useful, is expected to make mistakes, and is there to learn.

The community votes and promotes them to junior (or whatever). They know they are on the right track. A junior review is useful but maybe not as complete as a senior reviewer. Maybe I'll aspire to work harder, and maybe not, but at least I know what I'm doing is useful. If I never get promoted, then I know, as well.

Freshmen know its ok to make mistakes. They know who they can contact for help.

I think I like belts better (yellow, green, red, black).

I think this gives me two things:
  1) permission to mess up
  2) ability to measure myself

-Andy


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to