* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> So my two cents is that when considering a qualified name, this patch
> should take levenshtein distance across the two components equally.
> There's no good reason to suppose that typos will attack one name
> component more (nor less) than the other.

Agreed (since it seems like folks are curious for the opinion's of
mostly bystanders).

+1 to the above for my part.

        Thanks,

                Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to