On 17 December 2014 at 06:07, Teodor Sigaev <teo...@sigaev.ru> wrote: > > I think this suggestion is misguided, and the patch itself needs >> rethinking. Instead of doing this, let's hack dynahash.c itself >> to substitute a shim like this when it's told function == tag_hash and >> keysize == sizeof(uint32). Then we can remove any similar shims that >> already exist, and possibly end up with a net savings of code rather than >> adding more. >> > done, actoually I found oid_hash shim only. > > - hash_ctl.hash = oid_hash; /* a bit more efficient than tag_hash */ + hash_ctl.hash = tag_hash; /* a bit more efficient than tag_hash */
I think the comment may need removed here. Regards David Rowley
