Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > I would have preferred (and I believe argued for) keeping the existing > catalog representation for existing attributes and using a bitmask for > new ones, to avoid breaking client code. But I am not sure if that's > actually the best decision. I find Tom's concern about needing more > than 64 attributes to be ill-founded; I can't really see that > happening on any timescale that matters.
I tend to agree, which is why I'm questioning the decision to not just keep adding bool columns. I don't see how that's not both more convenient and less surprising. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers