On 12/23/14, 8:54 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> Right now a lot of people just work around this with things like DO blocks,
but as mentioned elsewhere in the thread that fails for commands that can't be in
a transaction.
>
I use "dblink" to solve it. :-)
So... how about instead of solving this only for vacuum we create something
generic? :) Possibly using Robert's background worker work?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
