On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Alexey Vasiliev <leopard...@inbox.ru> wrote: > To not modify current pg_usleep calculation, I changed > restore_command_retry_interval value to seconds (not milliseconds). In this > case, min value - 1 second. Er, what the problem with not changing 1000000L to 1000L? The unit of your parameter is ms AFAIK.
Also, I am not really getting the meaning of this paragraph: + <para> + This is useful, if I using for restore of wal logs some + external storage and no matter what the slave database + will lag behind the master. + </para> Could you be more explicit here? What do you want to mean here? (btw, please let's keep the thread readable and not reply at the top of each post). -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
