On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Of course, if recovery_min_apply_delay were a proper GUC, we'd just > configure it with a minimum value of zero and be done :-(
Amen. We should *really* convert all of the recovery.conf parameters to be GUCs. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
