On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: > Anyway, I suggest to keep that for another round and keep the Robert's > isofunctional patch as it is before extending.
+1. Let's please get the basic thing committed, and then people can write more patches to extend and improve it. There is no reason to squash-merge every enhancement someone might want here into what I wrote. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
