On 2015-01-14 10:01:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > On 2015-01-14 09:34:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Well, that would only fix my problem if we added a configure-time test > >> for whether gcc recognizes "z", which frankly seems like a waste of > >> cycles. I've probably got the last one left in captivity that doesn't. > > > Hm. I had kinda assumed that %z support for sprintf and gcc's > > recognition of the format string would coincide and we could just use > > the %z result. But gull's output doesn't actually that way. > > It's only reasonable to assume that gcc matches sprintf if gcc is the > native (vendor-supplied) compiler for the platform. That's not the > case on gaur. It used to be very very commonly not the case, though > I think a lot of vendors have now abandoned their proprietary compilers. > If we were to test for this at all, I think we'd need to make the test > separate from the one for sprintf's behavior.
I've already given up... Given how infrequent it is, suppressing it for gull seems sufficient. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
