Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2015-01-15 10:57:10 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> While I'll not cry too hard when we decide to break C89 compatibility, >> I don't want it to happen accidentally; so having a pretty old-school >> compiler in the farm seems important to me.
> I'd worked on setting up a modern gcc (or was it clang?) with the > appropriate flags to warn about !C89 stuff some time back, but failed > because of configure bugs. My recollection is that there isn't any reasonable way to get gcc to warn about C89 violations as such. -ansi -pedantic is not very fit for the purpose. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers