On 01/15/2015 09:57 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote:
Here's an updated version, rebased over the pairing heap code that I just
committed, and fixing those bugs.
So, are we reaching an outcome for the match happening here?
Well, I still like using the existing ResourceOwner pointers to find
the snapshots more than introducing a separate data structure just for
that. But I'm OK with Heikki committing his version and, if anybody
notices the new code becoming a hotspot, we can revisit the issue.
Ok, committed.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
