On 2015-01-18 22:02:13 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Andrew Gierth > > 2) in any event it is essentially deprecated in favour of standby_mode > > and therefore moving it to src/bin seems like a wrong move on two counts? > There were some discussions about that a couple of months ago, and the > conclusion was to not remove it. Please see here for more information: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/545946e9.8060...@gmx.net#545946e9.8060...@gmx.net
Sure, but not removing doesn't imply moving it. The other tools don't have a replacement and are more or less actively maintained. I don't think that's really the case for pg_standby. We do *not* want to give it more credence by declaring it to be part of core. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
