On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > To make things better in the buildfarm, we'd have to back-patch this into > all active branches, but I don't see any big problem with doing so. > Any objections? Back-patching sounds like a good idea to me. At least this will allow hamster to build all the active branches. -- Michael
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
