On 23/01/15 00:40, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
- Renamed some things from int12 to int128, there are still some places with int16 which I am not sure what to do with.
I'd vote for renaming them to int128 too, there is enough C functions that user int16 for 16bit integer that this is going to be confusing otherwise.
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers