On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Yes, that's my view too. I would generally be for that change also and it > would be worth it if the code was used in more than one place, but as it is > it seems like it will just add code/complexity for no real benefit. It would > make sense in case we used sequential scan node instead of the new node as > Amit also suggested, but I remain unconvinced that mixing sampling and > sequential scan into single scan node would be a good idea.
Based on previous experience, I expect that any proposal to merge those nodes would get shot down by Tom with his laser-guided atomic bazooka faster than you can say "-1 from me regards tom lane". -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
