On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> David Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:05 PM, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> wrote:
>>>> Why might the contents of pg_settings be different from what would be
>>>> in pg_file_settings, apart from the existence of this column?
>>
>>> The contents of pg_settings uses the setting name as a primary key.
>>> The contents of pg_file_setting uses a compound key consisting of the
>>> setting name and the source file.
>>
>> [ raised eyebrow... ]  Seems insufficient in the case that multiple
>> settings of the same value occur in the same source file.  Don't you
>> need a line number in the key as well?
>>
>
> Yep, a line number is also needed.
> The source file and line number would be primary key of pg_file_settings view.
> I need to change like that.
>

Attached patch is latest version including following changes.
- This view is available to super use only
- Add sourceline coulmn

Also I registered CF app.

Regards,

-------
Sawada Masahiko

Attachment: 000_pg_file_settings_view_v2.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to