On 02/01/2015 08:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I propose that we go over to a policy of keeping in HEAD only release > notes for actively maintained branches, and that each back branch should > retain notes only for branches that were actively maintained when it split > off from HEAD. This would keep about five years worth of history in > Appendix E, which should be a roughly stable amount of text.
I'd like to keep a complete, downloadable version of the release notes somewhere on the website; it's helpful to have "one big file" for searches. It doesn't need to be in our core docs, though. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
