On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I think these days there's no reason for the split between the archive > and hot_standby wal levels. The split was made out of volume and > stability concerns. I think we can by now be confident about the > wal_level = hot_standby changes (note I'm not proposing hot_standby = > on). +1.
> So let's remove the split. It just gives users choice between two options > that don't have a meaningful difference. The last time I mentioned something similar (purely removing archive from wal_level CA+TgmoaTG9U4=a_bs8sbdemm2+fapqhzujhj7f-npfy+bns...@mail.gmail.com), there were two additional suggestions done as well: - Keep archive and make it mean archive <=> hot_standby - Do nothing to still let the users what they think is better and not what we think is better. Perhaps times have changed since... I guess that you mean making both values become equivalent, right? -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
