On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > I wrote: >> Christoph Berg <c...@df7cb.de> writes: >>> gcc5 is lurking in Debian experimental, and it's breaking initdb. > >> Yeah, I just heard the same about Red Hat as well: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190978 >> Not clear if it's an outright compiler bug or they've just found some >> creative new way to make an optimization assumption we're violating. > > Apparently, it's the former. See > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190978#c3 > > I will be unamused if the gcc boys try to make an argument that they > did some valid optimization here.
You're new here, aren't you? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
