On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com>
wrote:

> Here's v0.5. (Why did you use that weird decimal versioning scheme?  You
> could just say "v4" and save a couple of keystrokes).  This patch makes
> perfect sense to me now.  I was ready to commit, but I checked the
> regression test you added and noticed that you're only reading results
> for the last set of operations because they all use the same table and
> so each new set clobbers the values for the previous one.  So I modified
> them to use one table for each set, and report the counters for all
> tables.  In doing this I noticed that the one for trunc_stats_test3 is
> at odds with what your comment in the .sql file says; would you review
> it please?  Thanks.
>
> (I didn't update the expected file.)
>
> BTW you forgot to update expected/prepared_xact_1.out, for the case when
> prep xacts are disabled.
>
> If some other committer decides to give this a go, please remember to
> bump catversion before pushing.
>

Alex, this patch seems nicely backed. Could you review the changes of
Alvaro? This thread is waiting for your input for 3 weeks.
-- 
Michael

Reply via email to