Is there going to be a way to use transactions inside transactions of
transactions?
In other words:
BEGIN;
BEGIN;
BEGIN;
BEGIN;
COMMIT;
COMMIT;
COMMIT;
COMMIT;
Is there a way to have some sort of recursive solution with every
transaction but the first one being a child transaction?
Is there a way to implement that without too much extra effort?
I just curious how that could be done.
Hans
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- Re: [HACKERS] nested transact... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] nested tran... Manfred Koizar
- Re: [HACKERS] nested tran... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] nested tran... Manfred Koizar
- Re: [HACKERS] nested tran... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] nested tran... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] nested tran... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] nested transactions Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] nested transactions Ken Hirsch
- Re: [HACKERS] nested transactions Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] nested transactions Hans-Jürgen Schönig
- Re: [HACKERS] nested transactions Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] nested transactions Kevin Brown
- Re: [HACKERS] nested transactions Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] nested transactions Bruce Momjian
- [HACKERS] Nested transactions Alvaro Herrera
- Re: [HACKERS] Nested transactions Manfred Koizar
- Re: [HACKERS] Nested transactions Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Nested transactions Alvaro Herrera
- [HACKERS] Nested transactions Alvaro Herrera
- [HACKERS] Nested transactions Cassio Polpo de Campos