Re: [HACKERS] nested transactions

[Hans-J�rgen Sch�nig]

Is there going to be a way to use transactions inside transactions of transactions?
In other words:

BEGIN;
BEGIN;
BEGIN;
BEGIN;

COMMIT;
COMMIT;
COMMIT;
COMMIT;

Is there a way to have some sort of recursive solution with every transaction but the first one being a child transaction?
Is there a way to implement that without too much extra effort?
I just curious how that could be done.

Hans




---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster