Hi! On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakan...@vmware.com > wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the review! I have committed this, with some cleanup and > more comments added. > ISTM that checks in pairingheap_GISTSearchItem_cmp is incorrect. This function should perform inverse comparison. Thus, if item a should be checked first function should return 1. Current behavior doesn't lead to incorrect query answers, but it could be slower than correct version. ------ With best regards, Alexander Korotkov.
pairing_heap_cmp_fix.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
