Matt Kelly <mkell...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Yeah. The only use-case that's been suggested is detecting an
>> unresponsive stats collector, and the main timestamp should be plenty for
>> that.
> The problem with doing highly granular snapshots is that the postgres
> counters are monotonically increasing, but only when stats are published.
> Currently you have no option except to divide by the delta of now() between
> the polling intervals. If you poll every 2 seconds the max error is about
> .5/2 or 25%. It makes reading those numbers a bit noisy. Using
> (snapshot_timestamp_new
> - snapshot_timestamp_old) as the denominator in that calculation should
> help to smooth out that noise and show a clearer picture.
Ah, interesting! Thanks for pointing out another use case.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
