On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Fabien COELHO <coe...@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote:
Anyway, I suggest to keep that for another round and keep the Robert's
isofunctional patch as it is before extending.
+1. Let's please get the basic thing committed, and then people can
write more patches to extend and improve it. There is no reason to
squash-merge every enhancement someone might want here into what I
wrote.
From my point of view the latest v6 of the patch is pretty "ready for
committers", but I'm not sure whom should decide that...
Should I just update the state in the commitfest interface?
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
