On 2/24/15 1:23 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com <mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com>> wrote: > On Feb 22, 2015, at 5:41 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com <mailto:michael.paqu...@gmail.com>> wrote: > This is up to the maintainer of each extension to manage their code > tree. However I can imagine that some people would be grateful if we > allow them to not need sql/ and expected/ containing only one single > .gitignore file ignoring everything with "*", making the code tree of > their extensions cleaner. I don't see this as an improvement. What's wrong with a .gitignore file ignoring everything? That's mainly a matter of code maintenance style (and I am on the side that a minimum number of folders in a git tree makes things easier to follow), and IMO it is strange to not have some flexibility. Btw, the reason why this patch exists is this thread of last December: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20141212134508.gt1...@alvh.no-ip.org#20141212134508.gt1...@alvh.no-ip.org
What's an example of this? I ask because what I'd like is to break the cluster management portion of pg_regress out on it's own to make it easy to get that functionality while using a different test framework (like pgTap).
-- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
