Andres Freund <and...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I'd really not even be surprised if a committer backpatches a > MemoryContextReset() addition, not realizing it behaves differently in > the back branches.
As far as that goes, the only consequence would be a possible memory leak in the back branches; it would not be a really fatal problem. I'd rather live with that risk than with the sort of intentional API break (and ensuing back-patch pain) that you're proposing. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers