On 27-02-2015 AM 03:24, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2015-02-26 12:15:17 +0900, Amit Langote wrote: >> On 26-02-2015 AM 05:15, Josh Berkus wrote: >>> I would love to have it for 9.5, but I guess the >>> patch isn't nearly baked enough for that? > >> I'm not quite sure what would qualify as baked enough for 9.5 though we >> can surely try to reach some consensus on various implementation aspects >> and perhaps even get it ready in time for 9.5. > > I think it's absolutely unrealistic to get this into 9.5. There's barely > been any progress on the current (last!) commitfest - where on earth > should the energy come to make this patch ready? And why would that be > fair against all the others that have submitted in time? >
I realize and I apologize that it was irresponsible of me to have said that; maybe got a bit too excited. I do not want to unduly draw people's time on something that's not quite ready while there are other things people have worked hard on to get in time. In all earnestness, I say we spend time perfecting those things. I'll add this into CF-JUN'15. I will keep posting updates meanwhile so that when that commitfest finally starts, we will have something worth considering. Thanks, Amit -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
