On 11/10/2014 10:54 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Heikki Linnakangas > <hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote: >> pg_standby is more configurable than the built-in standby_mode=on. You can >> set the sleep time, for example, while standby_mode=on uses a hard-coded >> delay of 5 s. And pg_standby has a configurable maximum wait time. And as >> Fujii pointed out, the built-in system will print an annoying message to the >> log every time it attempts to restore a file. Nevertheless, 99% of users >> would probably be happy with the built-in thing. > > As long as pg_standby has features that are actually useful and that > are not in the built-in system, we shouldn't remove it. We should, > however, try to fix those in the main system so we can get rid of it > after that :)
As of current 9.5, we have configurable retries and standby delay in mainstream. Is there some reason we still need pg_standby? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
