Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 22:17 +0000, Tom Lane wrote:
>> In passing, per discussion, rearrange some boolean fields in struct
>> MemoryContextData so as to avoid wasted padding space. For safety,
>> this requires making allowInCritSection's existence unconditional;
>> but I think that's a better approach than what was there anyway.
> I notice that this uses the bytes in MemoryContextData that I was hoping
> to use for the memory accounting patch (for memory-bounded HashAgg).
Meh. I thought Andres' complaint about that was unfounded anyway ;-).
But I don't really see why a memory accounting patch should be expected to
have zero footprint.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
