* Dean Rasheed ([email protected]) wrote: > On 26 February 2015 at 09:50, Dean Rasheed <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 26 February 2015 at 05:43, Stephen Frost <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I wonder if there are some documentation updates which need to be done > >> for this also? I'm planning to look as I vauguely recall mentioning the > >> ordering of operations somewhere along the way. > > I couldn't find any mention of the timing of the check in the existing > documentation, although it does vaguely imply that the check is done > before inserting any new data. There is an existing paragraph > describing the timing of USING conditions, so I added a new paragraph > immediately after that to explain when CHECK expressions are enforced, > since that seemed like the best place for it.
Ah, ok, I must have been thinking about the USING discussion. Thanks
for adding the paragraph about the CHECK timing.
> >> I also addressed the bitrot from the column-priv leak patch. Would be
> >> great to have you take a look at the latest and let me know if you have
> >> any further comments or suggestions.
>
> I looked it over again, and I'm happy with these updates, except there
> was a missing "break" in the switch statement in
> ExecWithCheckOptions().
Oh, thanks for catching that!
> Here's an updated patch.
Excellent, will review.
Thanks again!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
