* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 07:00:10PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > suggested to me as one change we could make that would reduce the risk > > of disk-based attacks while trading that off for a higher risk on the > > side of network-based attacks while not breaking the existing network > > protocol. To make it very clear- it is not a solution but rather a poor > > bandaid. What we really need is a new password based protocol which is > > based on a future-proof, well designed protocol, such as SCRAM. > > Again, agreed.
Great.
Have you had a chance to review the SCRAM RFC or do you have any
questions as it relates to how SCRAM works? I'd love to start a proper
discussion about how we go about implementing it.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
