Alvaro Herrera wrote: > With this patch applied, doing > \h ALTER ROLE > in psql looks quite odd: note how wide it has become. Maybe we should > be doing this differently? (Hmm, why don't we accept ALL in the first SET > line? Maybe that's just a mistake and the four lines should be all > identical in the first half ...)
I have fixed the remaining issues, completed the doc changes, and pushed. Given the lack of feedback I had to follow my gut on the best way to change the docs. I added the regression test you submitted with some additional changes, mainly to make sure they don't fail immediately when other databases exist; maybe some more concurrency or platform issues will show up there, but let's see what the buildfarm says. Thanks Horiguchi-san for the patch and everyone for the reviews. (It's probably worthwhile giving things an extra look.) -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
