On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Do we have consensus on doing this? Should we have the warning on > > by default, or off? > > I vote for defaulting the warning to off. If that proves to be too > problematic, I'd take that as a sign that this whole change is not as > low-impact as we're hoping, and maybe consider a rethink. > ​Do we want to have three states? On, Off, and Auto? We can then change what Auto means in a point-release while letting people who have chosen On or Off have their wish. Auto could also consider some other data - like how long ago the database was initialized​... I would vote for Auto meaning On in the .0 release. David J.
