On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote: > Yeah, that doesn't sound like a good tradeoff compared to making people type > some extra ()s. :( > > We should at least support ()s on the other commands though, so that we're > consistent.
I think we've been moving slowly in that direction, but it's not this patch's job to accelerate that transition. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
